Bültmann & Gerriets
The Pseudo-Platonic Seventh Letter
von Myles Burnyeat, Michael Frede
Verlag: Oxford University Press
E-Book / PDF
Kopierschutz: Adobe DRM


Speicherplatz: 2 MB
Hinweis: Nach dem Checkout (Kasse) wird direkt ein Link zum Download bereitgestellt. Der Link kann dann auf PC, Smartphone oder E-Book-Reader ausgeführt werden.
E-Books können per PayPal bezahlt werden. Wenn Sie E-Books per Rechnung bezahlen möchten, kontaktieren Sie uns bitte.

ISBN: 978-0-19-105338-2
Erschienen am 11.06.2015
Sprache: Englisch
Umfang: 208 Seiten

Preis: 65,49 €

65,49 €
merken
zum Hardcover 73,00 €
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Klappentext
Biografische Anmerkung

Editor's Introduction; Sicily time-line; Part I: Michael Frede; Seminar 1; Seminar 2; Seminar 3; Seminar 4; Seminar 5; Appendix; Dominic Scott: Editor's Guide; Carol Atack and Dominic Scott: Endnotes; Facsimile pages of Michael Frede's notes; Part II: Myles Burnyeat; 1 The pseudo-philosophical digression in Epistle VII; The second prose tragedy: a literary analysis 116 of the pseudo-Platonic Epistle VII; Appendix: Verbal repetitiveness in Epistle VII; Bibliography



The Seventh Platonic Letter describes Plato's attempts to turn the ruler of Sicily, Dionysius II, into a philosopher ruler along the lines of the Republic. It explains why Plato turned from politics to philosophy in his youth and how he then tried to apply his ideas to actual politics later on. It also sets out his views about language, writing and philosophy. As such, it represents a potentially crucial source of information about Plato, who tells us almost nothing about himself in his dialogues. But is it genuine? Scholars have debated the issue for centuries, although recent opinion has moved in its favour. The origin of this book was a seminar given in Oxford in 2001 by Myles Burnyeat and Michael Frede, two of the most eminent scholars of ancient philosophy in recent decades. Michael Frede begins by casting doubt on the Letter by looking at it from the general perspective of letter writing in antiquity, when it was quite normal to fabricate letters by famous figures from the past. Both then attack the authenticity of the letter head-on by showing how its philosophical content conflicts with what we find in the Platonic dialogues. They also reflect on the question of why the Letter was written, whether as an attempt to exculpate Plato from the charge of meddling in politics (Frede), or as an attempt to portray, through literary means, the ways in which human weakness and emotions can lead to disasters in political life (Burnyeat).



Myles Burnyeat is Emeritus Professor of Ancient Philosophy at Cambridge, and Honorary Fellow of Robinson College.
Michael Frede was formerly Professor of the History of Philosophy at Oxford University.
Dominic Scott is Senior Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Kent.


andere Formate