Bültmann & Gerriets
The File
Case Study in Correction (1977¿1979)
von Serge Lang
Verlag: Springer New York
Hardcover
ISBN: 978-0-387-90607-2
Auflage: 1981
Erschienen am 21.08.1981
Sprache: Englisch
Format: 280 mm [H] x 210 mm [B] x 39 mm [T]
Gewicht: 1748 Gramm
Umfang: 728 Seiten

Preis: 53,49 €
keine Versandkosten (Inland)


Dieser Titel wird erst bei Bestellung gedruckt. Eintreffen bei uns daher ca. am 14. Oktober.

Der Versand innerhalb der Stadt erfolgt in Regel am gleichen Tag.
Der Versand nach außerhalb dauert mit Post/DHL meistens 1-2 Tage.

53,49 €
merken
zum E-Book (PDF) 53,49 €
klimaneutral
Der Verlag produziert nach eigener Angabe noch nicht klimaneutral bzw. kompensiert die CO2-Emissionen aus der Produktion nicht. Daher übernehmen wir diese Kompensation durch finanzielle Förderung entsprechender Projekte. Mehr Details finden Sie in unserer Klimabilanz.
Klappentext
Inhaltsverzeichnis

The File is a collection of documents from a major dispute
involving a number of American college professors, mainly
mathematicians, statisticians,and sociologists. The
controversy was ignited by the mathematician Serge Lang's
reaction to a questionnaire, "The 1977 Survey of the
American Professoriate", distributed by E. C. Ladd of the
University of Connecticut and S. M. Lipset of Stanford. The
ensuing discussion - in part acrimonious and personal - soon
involved a large group of active and passive participants,
and included issues such as survey techniques, evaluation of
academic work, public and political honesty, and McCarthyism
at Harvard.



Introductory Letter to the Reader.- Why bother? (Your point of view). Why bother? (My point of view). Editorial responsibility.- The letters. Introductory and other comments. Objectivity.- The Story: Summary.- A Reply to Lang.- The Ladd-Lipset Surveys-A Brief Review. The Methodology of the 1977 Survey. Survey Research on Public Opinion and Social Values. Sampling. Nonresponse. Question Design and Questionnaire Development. Envoi..- The File.- "The 1977 Survey of the American Professoriate".- VERITAS AT HARVARD, by Sigmund Diamond from the New York Review of Books, 28 April 1977.- The First Year.- One: The Opening Exchange.- Two: From Koblitz's Letter to Lang's Fifteen Pages of Comments.- Three: From Lang's Comments to the Science Article.- Four: From Science to New York Review of Books.- Five: The Garfinkel Letter ("McCarthyism"?).- Six: The New York Review of Books Article.- The Second Year.- Seven: Trying to Settle Loose Ends.- Eight: The Chronicle Causes a Rebound.- Nine: From Mac Lane's Letter to the Editors (Notices, AMS) to Lang's Letter to the Editor (Bulletin, AAUP).- Ten: The Stakes Are Raised.- Eleven: The "Ratings" Get Publicity.- Twelve: The AAUP-Chronicle Relation.- Thirteen: End of the Second Year.- Into a Third Year.- Fourteen: "McCarthyism"? (Again).- Fifteen: "Intemperate and Libelous"?.- Sixteen: Ladd-Lipset, Survey Research, Sociology. Can We Generalize? How?.- Seventeen: The Story Goes On.- Eighteen: Closing the File.- Appendices.- Appendix II. Documents on the Carnegie-ACE 1969 Survey.- Lang Letter to Clark Kerr on the 1969 Survey.- Appendix III. "Representative Sampling, I: Non-scientific Literature," by William Kruskal and Frederic Mosteller.- Appendix IV. Veritas at Harvard.- Some Themes and Issues.- S.Lang.- Correction. "The 1977 Survey of the American Professoriate": quality; use of the questionnaire; academic effect; administrative effect and public effect. Survey research. Sociology. Social Sciences. VERITAS AT HARVARD. Scholarship: academic only? active? political? Journalistic power; the cc list; letters to the editor. Financial power. Subservience to authority and power: intellectual authority; statutory authority and power. The competence of the surveyors. The personal aspect of the file. The methodology of the file. Collegiality. Responsibility: institutional; journalistic; scientific; personal. Conclusion.- Publication of the File.- Comments and Letters.- "Selective Memory and Scholarly Controversy,".- Seymour Martin Lipset.


andere Formate