This title explores the procedural and substantive principles of administration law. It uses case studies and comparative studies of procedural fairness and propriety in courts to find the similarities and differences among various legal systems. Along with several European countries, it also covers Latin America and China.

Giacinto della Cananea is a professor and leading authority on EU administrative law and comparative administrative law. His publications include five monographs, 20 edited volumes, and over 150 articles, book chapters, and comments to judicial decisions on national and EU administrative law, global administrative law, and public finances. He is a co-ordinator of ReNEUAL, and a member of the European Group of Public Law, the European Constitutional Law Network, the Societas Juris Public Europei, and the Dornburg Group of Administrative Law.
Mads Andenas is a professor of law at University of Oslo, and the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London. He is also a barrister at Brick Court Chambers in London. He is the former President-Rapporteur, United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (2009-15); Director, The British Institute of International and Comparative Law (1999-2006); and Director, Centre of European law, King's College, University of London (1991-99). Mads has held positions as Senior Fellow, Oxford Institute of European and Comparative Law (2000-2010); Chaire Vincent Wright at Sciences-Po (2011-12); Visiting Professor at Sapienza Università di Roma; and Peter Ellinger Visiting Professor at University of Singapore (2019-20). He is the General Editor of the ICLQ and the EBLR. In 2011, he received the Don Pino Puglisi Prize for his human rights work. He is on the Panel of Arbitrators maintained by the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.

• I - General Principles and Comparative Studies


• 1.: Giacinto della Cananea and Mads Andenas: Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review: A 'Common Core' Research


• 2.: Ulrich Stelkens: The Common Core of European Administrative Laws and the Pan-European General Principles of Good Administration


• II - The Legal Systems Selected for Comparison: Principles and Remedies


• 3.: Stefan Storr: Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in Austria


• 4.: David Renders, Luca Ceci, Sarah Koval: Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in Belgium


• 5.: Xiaowei Sun: Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in China


• 6.: Matteo Gnes and Marco Macchia: Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in the European Union


• 7.: Delphine Costa: Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in France


• 8.: Lilly Weidemann: Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in Germany


• 9.: Andràs Varga: Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in Hungary


• 10.: Diana-Urania Galetta and Paolo Provenzano: Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in Italy


• 11.: Allan Brewer-Carias: Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in Latin America


• 12.: Agné Andrijauskaite: Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in Lithuania


• 13.: Oriol Mir Puigpelat: Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in Spain


• 14.: Thierry Tanquerel: Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in Switzerland


• 15.: Halyna Dovhan: Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in Ukraine


• 16.: Sarah Nason: Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in the United Kingdom


• III. Cases


• 17.: Cases


• IV. Comparative Analysis


• 18.: Mads Andenas: EU Countries and the UK


• 19.: Jacques Ziller: EU Member States and other European countries


• 20.: Mario P. Chiti: Europe and Latin America


• 21.: Danilo Pappano: Europe and China


• 22.: Giacinto della Cananea: Judicial Oversight of Procedural Fairness and Propriety in Europe: Diversity Within Commonality