Bültmann & Gerriets
The Politics of Judicial Review
Supranational Administrative Acts and Judicialized Compliance Conflict in the EU
von Christian Adam
Verlag: Palgrave Macmillan UK
Reihe: European Administrative Governance
E-Book / PDF
Kopierschutz: PDF mit Wasserzeichen

Hinweis: Nach dem Checkout (Kasse) wird direkt ein Link zum Download bereitgestellt. Der Link kann dann auf PC, Smartphone oder E-Book-Reader ausgeführt werden.
E-Books können per PayPal bezahlt werden. Wenn Sie E-Books per Rechnung bezahlen möchten, kontaktieren Sie uns bitte.

ISBN: 978-1-137-57832-7
Auflage: 1st ed. 2016
Erschienen am 20.04.2016
Sprache: Englisch
Umfang: 179 Seiten

Preis: 53,49 €

53,49 €
merken
zum Hardcover 53,49 €
Biografische Anmerkung
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Klappentext

Christian Adam is Assistant Professor at the University of Munich, Germany. His research focuses on policy change, policy implementation and the role of courts and litigation in these processes. He published in the Journal of Common Market Studies, Journal of Theoretical Politics, and International Journal of Drug Policy.



Chapter 1. Introduction.- Part I. Tracing Causal Mechanisms: Why Governments Activate the Court of Justice.- Chapter 2. Policy Misfit and Governmental Litigation.- Chapter 3. Governmental Litigation as a form of Legal Activism.- Part II. Moving Beyond Anecdotal Evidence: The Role of Policy Misfit and Legal Activism in the EU's State and Policy Regime.- Chapter 4. State Aid Control in the European Union.- Chapter 5. Governmental Litigation, Policy Misfit and Legal Activism in the EU's State Aid.- Chapter 6. Conclusion.



This book unites scholarship on law and politics with compliance research in the EU to shed light on the political role of a neglected dimension of litigation in the EU: the political role of governmental actions for annulment. The book does not portray national governments as passive actors within the EU's judicial arena. Instead it focuses on cases in which national governments turn to the Court of Justice to litigate against the European Commission, and provides several answers to the question of why EU member state governments take this decision. Governments hope, on the one hand, to evade costly domestic adjustments where the Commission uses administrative acts to interfere with domestic policy application. On the other hand, governments hope to provoke judicial law-making to influence the long-term development of EU administrative law and sectoral regulation. The book will be of particular interest to political scientists and legal scholars.

.


andere Formate
weitere Titel der Reihe