Bültmann & Gerriets
Revising Cognitive and Evolutionary Science of Religion
Religion as an Adaptation
von Konrad Szocik, Hans Van Eyghen
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Reihe: New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion Nr. 8
E-Book / PDF
Kopierschutz: PDF mit Wasserzeichen

Hinweis: Nach dem Checkout (Kasse) wird direkt ein Link zum Download bereitgestellt. Der Link kann dann auf PC, Smartphone oder E-Book-Reader ausgeführt werden.
E-Books können per PayPal bezahlt werden. Wenn Sie E-Books per Rechnung bezahlen möchten, kontaktieren Sie uns bitte.

ISBN: 978-3-030-63516-9
Auflage: 1st ed. 2021
Erschienen am 12.01.2021
Sprache: Englisch
Umfang: 124 Seiten

Preis: 53,49 €

53,49 €
merken
Biografische Anmerkung
Inhaltsverzeichnis

Konrad Szocik is a doctor of philosophy and assistant professor in Department of Social Sciences at University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszów, Poland. His research interests include cognitive and evolutionary science of religion, evolution of cooperation, space ethics and bioethics, space philosophy and space policy, and the ethics of human enhancement.

Hans Van Eyghen is assistant professor of Philosophy at Tilburg University the Netherlands. His research interests include religious epistemology, philosophy of religion and cognitive and evolutionary science of religion.



Introduction.- Chapter1. Cognitive approach to the study of religion: basic concepts and theories.- Chapter2. Adaptationist account and pragmatic usefulness of religion.- Chapter3. Content biases versus context biases and the critique of intuitiveness and naturalness of religion.- Chapter4. Religion and biological evolution: what is right and what is wrong in Darwinian approach to the study of religion.- Chapter5. Religion and cultural evolution. Does supernatural punishment matter for evolution of altruism and cooperation?.- Chapter6. The challenge of atheism and non-belief for cognitive and evolutionary approach.- Chapter7. Why adaptationist account is better than cognitive one but both of them do not provide sufficient explanatory frameworks to explain religion.- Conclusion.


weitere Titel der Reihe