Bültmann & Gerriets
Games to Play and Games not to Play
Strategic Decisions via Extensions of Game Theory
von Joseph Agassi, Uri Weiss
Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland
Reihe: Studies in Systems, Decision and Control Nr. 469
Gebundene Ausgabe
ISBN: 978-3-031-27600-2
Auflage: 2023
Erschienen am 19.05.2023
Sprache: Englisch
Format: 241 mm [H] x 160 mm [B] x 20 mm [T]
Gewicht: 541 Gramm
Umfang: 248 Seiten

Preis: 181,89 €
keine Versandkosten (Inland)


Dieser Titel wird erst bei Bestellung gedruckt. Eintreffen bei uns daher ca. am 15. Oktober.

Der Versand innerhalb der Stadt erfolgt in Regel am gleichen Tag.
Der Versand nach außerhalb dauert mit Post/DHL meistens 1-2 Tage.

klimaneutral
Der Verlag produziert nach eigener Angabe noch nicht klimaneutral bzw. kompensiert die CO2-Emissionen aus der Produktion nicht. Daher übernehmen wir diese Kompensation durch finanzielle Förderung entsprechender Projekte. Mehr Details finden Sie in unserer Klimabilanz.
Klappentext
Inhaltsverzeichnis

This book contributes to the theoretical discussions of equilibria that rest on error¿in which we include mistaken choices of games to play. Extant game theory recommends diverse strategies (plans of actions) for various given games, particularly those in Nash equilibria, in which no player benefits from one-sided strategy alteration. The literature also refers to the design of games that fit given goals. This is the mechanism design theory; its function is to serve social planners ignorant of the preferences of the people intended to play them.
Our study of games avoidance adds to game theory the meta-game of choosing what game to play and what game to avoid playing, and that both players and planners can generate. This comprises a shift from the maximalist position that aims to maximize possible profit to the minimalist one that aims at minimizing possible loss. This shift depends on the question, considering the public interest, what set of games is it advisable to encourage? Obviously, it is advisable to encourage playing some groups of games such as trade, as well as to discourage playing other groups of games such as wars. This shift makes the theory much more applicable to social science: usually, choosing what game to play is less practical than choosing what game not to play. This invites legislation and similar incentives; their study should aim at the improvement of their usefulness.
Discussing the possibility of changing both game and strategy renders game theory part-and-parcel of social science. For this mathematical models will not do: it requires a clear distinction between describing options and explaining situations. Explanations may enhance efforts at improvement.



Introduction: Game Theory and Peace.- Strategic Decisions: Game and Strategy: Extended Game Theory.- Game Theory Encourages Peace.- International Accords.- Game Theory as Part-and-parcel of Social Science.- The Game Theory of the European Union versus the Pax Romana.- Playing the Game of International Law.- Mutual Threat: The Game of the Cold War.- Equilibria in Games of War and Peace: Options for Cooperation.- The Game not Chosen: Equilibria of Games about Games.


andere Formate
weitere Titel der Reihe