Bültmann & Gerriets
Linguistic Purism in Action
How auxiliary tun was stigmatized in Early New High German
von Nils Langer
Verlag: De Gruyter
Reihe: Studia Linguistica Germanica Nr. 60
E-Book / PDF
Kopierschutz: Adobe DRM

Hinweis: Nach dem Checkout (Kasse) wird direkt ein Link zum Download bereitgestellt. Der Link kann dann auf PC, Smartphone oder E-Book-Reader ausgeführt werden.
E-Books können per PayPal bezahlt werden. Wenn Sie E-Books per Rechnung bezahlen möchten, kontaktieren Sie uns bitte.

ISBN: 978-3-11-088110-3
Auflage: Reprint 2013
Erschienen am 18.02.2013
Sprache: Englisch
Umfang: 322 Seiten

Preis: 139,95 €

139,95 €
merken
zum Hardcover 139,95 €
Klappentext
Biografische Anmerkung

The auxiliary do (tun) is one of the most-discussed constructions in West Germanic. In German, there is a striking opposition between modern standard German, where the construction is virtually ungrammatical and considered to be "sub-standard" by most speakers, whilst, as this book shows, the construction is attested in all modern dialects as well as historic stages since 1350. In answering why auxiliary tun is ungrammatical in modern standard German, it is shown that the stigmatization of tun was caused by prescriptive grammarians in the 16th-18th century. Furthermore it is shown that the stigmatization of tun as "bad" German occurred in clearly discernible stages, from bad poetry (1550-1680), to bad written German (1680-1740) and finally to "bad" German in general (after 1740), thus providing evidence that the history of the standardization of German needs to take into account direct metalinguistic comments from prescriptive grammarians. The effectiveness of linguistic purism is also shown by evidence from two other constructions, namely polynegation and double perfect.


The author received his doctorate at the University of Tyne and now teaches German Studies at the University of Bristol.


andere Formate
weitere Titel der Reihe