Bültmann & Gerriets
Human Being @ Risk
Enhancement, Technology, and the Evaluation of Vulnerability Transformations
von Mark Coeckelbergh
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Reihe: Philosophy of Engineering and Technology Nr. 12
E-Book / PDF
Kopierschutz: PDF mit Wasserzeichen

Hinweis: Nach dem Checkout (Kasse) wird direkt ein Link zum Download bereitgestellt. Der Link kann dann auf PC, Smartphone oder E-Book-Reader ausgeführt werden.
E-Books können per PayPal bezahlt werden. Wenn Sie E-Books per Rechnung bezahlen möchten, kontaktieren Sie uns bitte.

ISBN: 9789400760257
Auflage: 2013
Erschienen am 15.02.2013
Sprache: Englisch
Umfang: 218 Seiten

Preis: 171,19 €

Inhaltsverzeichnis
Klappentext

Part I Descriptive Anthropology of Vulnerability.- Chapter 1. The Transhumanist Challenge.- Chapter 2. An Anthropology of Vulnerability.- Chapter 3. Cultures and Transformations of Vulnerability.- Part II Normative Anthropology of Vulnerability.- Chapter 4. Ethics of Vulnerability (1): Implications for ethics of technology.- Chapter 5. Ethics of Vulnerability (2): Imagining the Posthuman future.- Chapter 6. Ethics of Vulnerability (3): Vulnerability in the Information Age.- Chapter 7. Politics of Vulnerability: Freedom, Justice, and the Public/Private distinction.- Chapter 8. Normative Aesthetics of Vulnerability: The Art of Coping with Vulnerability.- Conclusion.



Whereas standard approaches to risk and vulnerability presuppose a strict separation between humans and their world, this book develops an existential-phenomenological approach according to which we are always already beings-at-risk. Moreover, it is argued that in our struggle against vulnerability, we create new vulnerabilities and thereby transform ourselves as much as we transform the world.

Responding to the discussion about human enhancement and information technologies, the book then shows that this dynamic-relational approach has important implications for the evaluation of new technologies and their risks. It calls for a normative anthropology of vulnerability that does not ask which objective risks are acceptable, how we can become invulnerable, or which technologies threaten human nature, but which vulnerability transformations we want. To the extent that we can steer the growth of new technologies at all, this tragic and sometimes comic project should therefore be guided by what we want to become.¿


andere Formate