Bültmann & Gerriets
From Discourse to Logic
Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory Part 1
von U. Reyle, Hans Kamp
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Reihe: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy Nr. 42
Hardcover
ISBN: 9789401049160
Auflage: Softcover reprint of the original 1st ed. 1993
Erschienen am 27.09.2012
Sprache: Englisch
Format: 235 mm [H] x 155 mm [B] x 39 mm [T]
Gewicht: 1083 Gramm
Umfang: 728 Seiten

Preis: 353,09 €
keine Versandkosten (Inland)


Dieser Titel wird erst bei Bestellung gedruckt. Eintreffen bei uns daher ca. am 22. Oktober.

Der Versand innerhalb der Stadt erfolgt in Regel am gleichen Tag.
Der Versand nach außerhalb dauert mit Post/DHL meistens 1-2 Tage.

353,09 €
merken
andere Ausgabe 320,99 €
klimaneutral
Der Verlag produziert nach eigener Angabe noch nicht klimaneutral bzw. kompensiert die CO2-Emissionen aus der Produktion nicht. Daher übernehmen wir diese Kompensation durch finanzielle Förderung entsprechender Projekte. Mehr Details finden Sie in unserer Klimabilanz.
Klappentext
Inhaltsverzeichnis

Preface This book is about semantics and logic. More specifically, it is about the semantics and logic of natural language; and, even more specifically than that, it is about a particular way of dealing with those subjects, known as Discourse Representation Theory, or DRT. DRT is an approach towards natural language semantics which, some thirteen years ago, arose out of attempts to deal with two distinct problems. The first of those was the semantic puzzle that had been brought to contempo­ rary attention by Geach's notorious "donkey sentences" - sentences like If Pedro owns some donkey, he beats it, in which the anaphoric connection we perceive between the indefinite noun phrase some donkey and the pronoun it may seem to conflict with the existential meaning of the word some. The second problem had to do with tense and aspect. Some languages, for instance French and the other Romance languages, have two morphologically distinct past tenses, a simple past (the French Passe Simple) and a continuous past (the French Imparfait). To articulate precisely what the difference between these tenses is has turned out to be surprisingly difficult.



1.- 0 Preliminaries.- 1 DRT and Predicate Logic.- 2 Quantification and Connectives.- 3 Loose Ends.- 2.- 4 The Plural.- 5 Tense and Aspect.- Table of Construction Rules.- Index of Symbols, Features and Feature Values.- Index of Names.- Index of Subjects.


andere Formate